Brave Blue Worlds: An Update

Brave Blue Words has been offline for a few months, due to technical difficulties. All that has been resolved and I am happy to report that your favorite ocean and climate science blog will be back later this month with a brand-new post! I will update you on what I learned from speaking with some of India’s most respected climate scientists and attending the AOGS Symposium in Hyderabad. And of course, I’ll add a few personal tidbits that are sure to tempt you to travel to Incredible India yourself! So stay tuned – more to come.

In the meantime, I’ll leave you a related story from my favorite science news site, ScienceDaily.

Decrease in global carbon dioxide emissions; CO2 from China, India on the rise

ScienceDaily (2010-09-02) — Global carbon dioxide emissions decreased in 2009, the first decrease recorded this decade. However, in China and India the emissions increased by 9 and 6 percent.

Read more at: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/09/100901073359.htm#

Brave Blue World

Today I take off for India to learn more about regional climate science and policy.  I’ll blog as I go, keeping you posted on what I learn, and all the interesting researchers and advocates whom I meet.

But here’s something for you to read now: I was recently interviewed by The Reef Tank, a wonderful blog and community of aquarium, reef and ocean enthusiasts.  You can read the interview here, and while you’re on the site, take a look around at their many amazing articles and links.

Enjoy!

The sea is the lifeblood of the planet

I’m heading off to India on Sunday and currently in the midst of last-minute work and packing. I’ll blog about my trip, so stay tuned! For now, I’ll leave you with a revision of a speech I gave a number of years ago to the Independent World Commissions on the Oceans (IWCO) in 1997. The talk was subsequently published as an op-ed in the Providence Journal on June 25, 1997.

Here it is, slightly updated for the new millennium:

The oceans are home to a wealth of plant and animal species. They play a major role in regulating global weather and climate. They supply us with food and livelihoods, supporting our cultures and fueling our economies. And they provide us with an endless source of inspiration.

Exploring the deepest ocean trench is no less fantastic than glimpsing a distant star. For thousands of years humankind has stood in awe before the power of the ocean, taking to the sea in search for answers and adventure. From the sea-faring islanders of the South Pacific to the ancient peoples of the Mediterranean, humankind has looked to the sea with respect for its life-sustaining capacity, and reverence for its inherent majesty.

Ocean waves

Every day we learn more about the watery realm that covers more than two-thirds of the globe. In addition to inspiring us, our growing knowledge of how the oceans work alerts us to the many challenges we face in conserving them for the future. Ocean issues require an international approach. Nations who wish to have long-term positive impacts cannot act unilaterally. Nor can any nation afford to abstain from action. The challenges that face the waters of the world affect all of us, everywhere. Water flows from shore to shore and fish and other marine species migrate across the imaginary lines that we draw between nations, regions, and territories. Pollution does not respect borders and the carbon dioxide that affects our climate warms the air and raises the level of the sea without regard to the ideologies, economies, or politics of the people who live on the land.

Caring about the oceans forces us to think globally even when we are acting to protect the waters outside our own doors. All the shores of all the countries are touched by the same oceans as it flows around the globe. Caring for the oceans means not only caring for the beaches near our homes but also having concern for all the beaches near all of the homes all over the world.

I love the smell of the sea and the sound of the surf. I love the fantastic variety of of creatures that live in the sea, all their different shapes, sizes, and strange colors. I love the motion and the freedom of the sea, the idea that the waves that touch the shores of Maryland, where I live, originated way across the Atlantic or from the Caribbean far south, and the water that laps the shore has traveled around the globe – many times.

We live on a water planet. We humans who are bound to the surface by our lungs and feet live on a planet that is more than 70 percent sea. A global sea comprised of myriad species and resources that we cannot live without, and endanger at our own expenses, as well as that of every other inhabitant of this Earth. The oceans are the lifeblood of this planet we call home. The are the very womb of creation. And they are the heritage of all humankind.

Is climate change separate from or a direct result of development?

As many of you know, I have enrolled in an e-course, “Global Warming in a Still Unequal World,” taught by the Centre for Science and Environment in India. The course includes a number of assignments, which I will post as I complete them. Since I am leaving for India on June 27th, you can expect a number of posts in the next few weeks!

Our second assignment is to present an argument either in support of or against the following statement: “Climate change is not a ‘separate problem. It’s an effect of dominant trajectory of growth the world has embarked, & is still embarking, upon.” My response is below.

Since the European Industrial Revolution, what we call development has required enormous inputs of energy – energy to run factories, drive engines, to manufacture fertilizers, and to heat and light homes and businesses. Increasingly, this model of energy-intensive development is being employed in the developing world as well.

For the past century and a half, the energy needed for development has come form the burning of fossil fuels: coal, oil, and natural gas. This burning has released enormous amounts of CO2 and other GHGs into the atmosphere, GHGs that would otherwise remain underground. Therefore, it is clear that climate change has occurred as a direct result of the dominant mode of development. A mode that must always grow, always expand, is never satisfied with enough. That is by definition, unsustainable, as it depends upon non-renewal resources.

Therefore, I would say that climate change is not at all separate from the dominant trajectory of growth – it is a direct result of it and will not be ‘solved’ without addressing the completely contradictory and self-destructive development that has occurred to date. The development that is seen as “the good life” in the Western world – and the one to which the developing world aspires as well. It will not take tweaking or minor adjustments – changing a light bulb or driving less – but a major reorganization of Western cities and societies to reduce its carbon footprint and address the issue of climate change. The developing world can help by adopting low-energy technology and leapfrogging over the heavily polluting technologies and development trajectories of the West. But overall, it is the Western model of development that must be fundamentally changed for climate change to be fully addressed.

“Nothing Happend in Copenhagen. Why?”

The e-course I am taking, “Global Warming in a Still Unequal World,” taught by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) in India, opens with this assignment:

Write an essay of approximately 500 words on: “Nothing happened at Copenhagen: Why?”Alternatively, you could submit cartoon strip made by you.

As I am not much of a visual artist I opted for the essay. Here is my response, which I posted to the CSE website on Wednesday. (No comments have been made so far, but I joined the class late so most of them have likely moved onto the later assignments).

———————————————————————-

Nothing happened in Copenhagen. Why?

The fact that nothing happened at Copenhagen was terribly disappointing, but hardly a surprise. In the weeks that followed this failure, numerous analyses attempted to pinpoint why the much-anticipated meeting failed to produce a meaningful, binding climate agreement. Many focused on
individuals: what Wen Jiabao did, Obama said, etc. But these reports fail to acknowledge that much of the damage was done before anyone even left home.

Perhaps it started in Bangkok, when the Europeans echoed the Americans and refused to make further commitments under Kyoto. Then, African delegates walked out of the Barcelona meeting, threatening to do the same in Copenhagen if rich countries refused to make meaningful commitments. For months, US and UN officials made statements aimed at lowering expectations for the summit (Brian Tokar, Alternet, December 4, 2009). Much of the blame lies with the United States. For years American industries closely linked to emissions (coal, oil) have worked to undermine action on climate change. When errors were discovered in the 4th IPCC report, and leaked emails from East Anglia University suggested that scientists were suppressing results, U.S. conservatives used these opportunities to undermine confidence in climate science among the American public. Without the support of the public, Obama can do nothing.

However, none of this explains why Copenhagen and previous attempts have failed. The reason is far more fundamental than any one person or statement. The fact is that the North and South are speaking difference languages. The North speaks of economics, while the South speaks of equity. The North speaks of future emissions, while the South speaks of historical emissions. The North speaks of national targets, when the only economically, and morally significant measure is per capita emissions – the development-linked carbon emissions that each individual is entitled to by virtue of their inherent right to a life of dignity. Although both India and China are on track to surpass the United States in overall national emissions, neither will ever surpass the per capita emissions of the U.S. (This is true even for black carbon, supposedly a developing nation problem). Until we can speak the same language, nothing will be accomplished.

Rally for Climate Action, Copenhagen Dec. 12, 2009

Up to 100,000 people rallied for climate action in Copenhagen, December 12, 2009.

Did anything good come from Copenhagen? Yes. Developing nations negotiated on equal footing with developed nations, highlighting the lack of transparency of some of the negotiating tactics, and demanding visibility and inclusion in the final talks. Second, an active international climate movement was present throughout the proceedings, communicating to the negotiators and the world, that even if the politicians cannot come to agreement, the people of the world can act – and will. This was on display at the recent World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth, in Bolivia, which included more than 35,000 delegates from social movements and organizations from 140 countries. Action like this is critical to ensure that the next time world leaders meet, the people will have moved the discussion forward so that meaningful work can be done.

———————————————————————-

My fellow students haven’t left any comments (yet) but that doesn’t mean you can’t. What do you think about what did or didn’t happen Copenhagen? E-learning? My first school assignment in 15 years? Let us know below!

PS – while I wrote that I would blog about what I am learning, I mean only the highlights.  If you want to learn more about “Global Warming in a Still Unequal World,” sign up for the e-course yourself, here.

Write an essay of approximately 500 words on: “Nothing happened at Copenhagen: Why?”Alternatively, you could submit cartoon strip made by you.

Personal Lessons in Climate Change from India

Over the past 9 months or so, I have written a number of posts on climate change in South Asia, particularly at the ‘Third Pole,’ the ice-covered region that includes the Himalayas and the Tibetan Plateau. I have endeavored to learn as much as possible about the science and policy of this issue from the researchers who are working on it, both in the United states and worldwide. However, there is only so much one can learn from papers and journals. Therefore, I have taken steps to learn in a more direct fashion from the people living and researching these issues.

First, I’ve recently registered for an e-course called “Global Warming in an Unequal World,” taught by India’s Center for Science and Environment. “The Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) is a public interest research and advocacy organisation based in New Delhi. CSE researches into, lobbies for and communicates the urgency of development that is both sustainable and equitable.” Lest this seem like an easy A, the course includes quizzes, 500-750 word essay assignments and online debates, as well as critiques by and for fellow students. Conveniently enough, 500-750 words is just the right length for a blog post, so I will post my essay responses here, as well as critiques and feedback from the instructors.

The course must be completed within three months; however, since I leave for India on  June 26th, I plan to finish way before then. My second direct learning experience will take place in India from June 26 – July 9, 2010. Yes, I have chosen one of the hottest and wettest times to visit India.* (Hey, if I’m gonig to write about the monsoon, I should experience it for myself, right?)

I plan to spend sometmie in Delhi, then travel to Hyderabad to attend the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS) Conference (July 5-9, 2010). This five-day conference takes place every year in different countries in the region.  It is my very good fortune that this year’s conference will be in India, allowing me to learn from, and meet many of India’s best climate scientists, all in one place! Of course, the conference will also include scientists from elsewhere in the region and the world, all working on climate science. (There will be many other non-climate subjects covered as well, but I’ll have to discipline myself to stick to one subject area, or I’ll be comlpetely overwhelmed before the first day is over!)  The conference program includes session like: “Asian Aerosols and Climate: The Known and Unknown,” “Asian Snow-Glaciers and Climate Change,” and “Climate Change in Monsoon Asia-Pacific: Progress, Issues and Challenges.” There will also be three sessions on the preliminary results from the five-year, cross-cutting Asian Monsoon Year (AMY) experiments, coordinated by the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP). These should present excellent opportunities to learn about the latest research on climate change in South Asia. Of course, I plan to get in some tourist time as well!

I will blog about what I learn there as well – hopefully during my trip, but afterwards as well.  So stay tuned – lots more to come!

Have you discovered online or other ways to learn about climate change in different parts of the worl, from the people in those regions?  If so, please let us know, in the comment section below.

*According to the BBC weather website, in July the average temperatures for Delhi  are 27 – 36C (80 – 97F), and the “discomfort from heat and humidity” is “extreme,” with the additional fun of 180 mm (7″) of rainfall. For Hyderabad: 23C – 31C (73 – 88F), “discomfort is only “high,” with 152mm (6″) of rain).

Winds of Change: How Black Carbon Affects the South Asian Monsoon

In the previous post, I wrote about how the glaciers of the ‘Third Pole’ – the greater Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau region – are melting at a dramatic rate (just not as fast as mistakenly stated in the IPCC report). The key determinant of whether glaciers are retreating or advancing appears to be the South Asian summer monsoon (June – September). And the summer monsoon is changing.

The climate of South Asia and India is dominated by monsoons. Monsoons are large-scale wind patterns that predictably change direct with the seasons. Landmasses warm up – and cool down – faster than large bodies of water. In the summer, this means that the Tibetan Plateau warms faster than the Indian Ocean to the south. A large low pressure system builds over the land, drawing warm moist air from the ocean, and making the winds blow south to north. In the winter, the reverse is true: the landmass cools quickly, while the ocean holds onto its heat, causing the winds to reverse, blowing from north to south.

How the winds change: in the summer, the elevated Tibetan Plateau heats more rapidly than the ocean.

Pollutants, particularly black carbon (BC), are affecting this process. BC  – the black stuff in soot – is a byproduct of the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biofuels. In the winter, soot combines with dust blown from the west, creating huge clouds of haze that hug the southern slopes of the Himalayas. The BC in these clouds absorb solar radiation, warming the air even faster than usual. This draws more moisture to the region sooner, causing the early monsoon to intensify. This theory is known as the Elevated Heat Pump (Lau et al., 2006a, b), as the soot acts to pump heat up the Himalayan slopes. Observations show a widespread and sustained warming in the pre-monsoon season over the last three decades. In that same time period, early monsoon rainfall has increased by 20% (Gautam et al., 2009a, b).

Mid-tropospheric temprrature trend for pre-monsoon season (March-May) from 1979 to 2007. Warming along the southern slopes of the Himalayas is noted in red (Gautam et. al., 2009b).

Over the oceans, BC has a different, although equally damaging effect. BC combines with other anthropogenic aerosols, forming Atmospheric Brown Clouds (ABCs), large plumes of particles that can stretch over whole continents or ocean basins. These ABCs absorb solar radiation in the atmosphere, causing dimming below. This reduction of irradiance reduces evaporation and cools the surface, leading to a weakening of the later monsoon (Ramanathan 2005, 2008). The combined impact of these two phenomena, the Elevated Heat Pump and Solar Dimming, increases flooding during the early months of monsoon, and causes drought later on. Some studies suggest that over time the result will be an overall weakening of the monsoon and a reduction of rainfall over the region. Reduction in rainfall of great concern because in South Asia there is a strong positive correlation between the amount of precipitation and food production. The Indian summer monsoon is the biggest source of freshwater to the region: over 70% of the annual precipitation over India occurs during the summer monsoon.

Thankfully, mitigation of black carbon is much easier than CO2. Unlike CO2 and it’s greenhouse gas cousins, BC is a very short-lived pollutant. It only stays in the atmosphere for a week or so and doesn’t travel very far from its source. What that means is that reductions of BC will be felt immediately and locally. Reductions of BC have the added benefit of reducing air pollution, the 4th leading cause of death in the developing world. This is good news for India, the second largest producer of BC in the world after China. (The US is the largest producer of BC per capita).

This is NOT to say that global emissions reduction efforts should shift away from GHGs and the West’s responsibility to clean up its act. Reductions of CO2 and other long-lived GHGS are the ONLY way to stabilize global climate in the long run. BC reduction represents an opportunity for India to do something about climate change locally – stabilizing the monsoon, protecting local agriculture, and clearing the air – benefiting its own people in the near future.

References:

Gautam et al., 2009a. Aerosol and rainfall variability over the Indian monsoon region: distributions, trends and coupling. Annales Geophysicae, 27:3691-3703

Gautam et al., 2009b. Enhanced pre-monsoon warming over the Himalayan-Gangetic region from 1979 to 2007. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 36, L07704, doi: 10.1029/2009GL037641

Lau et al.,2006a. Asian summer monsoon anomalies induced by aerosol direct forcing – the role of the Tibetan Plateau. Climate Dynamics, 26: 855-864.

Lau et al.,2006b. Observational relationships between aerosol and Asian monsoon rainfall, and circulation Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, L21810, doi: 10.1029/2006GL027546

Ramanathan et al., 2005. Atmospheric brown clouds: Impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(15):5326-5333, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500656102

Ramanathan and Carmichael, 2008. Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nature Geoscience, 1:221-227, doi: 10.1038/ngeo156

….as well as numerous other papers by V. Ramanathan, a genius in this field and a genuinely nice and helpful guy.

Ritesh Gautam of NASA is well on his away to make an impact on this field too, and has been a great help, explaining the intricacies of the South Asian monsoon and the results of all the various models used to study it. Any errors in MY explanation above cannot be faulted to any of the above researchers, but are mine alone.

So, What is Happening with the Himalayan Glaciers?



There’s been a lot of news recently about the the IPCC’s erroneous statement about the Himalayan glaciers. Here’s the exact quote from the 4th IPCC Assessment Report, Climate Change 2007: Working Group II: Impacts, Adaption and Vulnerability, Section 10.6.2 The Himalayan glaciers:

“Glaciers in the Himalaya are receding faster than in any other part of the world and, if the present rate continues, the likelihood of them disappearing by the year 2035 and perhaps sooner is very high if the Earth keeps warming at the current rate. Its total area will likely shrink from the present 500,000 to 100,000 km2 by the year 2035 (WWF, 2005).”

There are two problems with this statement. First, the science: I have spoken to a number of glaciologists who are experts in the region and all have confirmed that this is not only unlikely, it is impossible – glaciers just do not work this way. This is just too fast. In fact, none of the scientists would give a date for when – or if – such a thing could happen. There are just too many unknowns.

Second: the IPCC report is supposed to be based on peer-reviewed science ONLY. Yet, the citation given for this statement is a World Wildlife Fund report, which was not subjected to the rigorous scrutiny that marks scientific publications. Following the trail backwards reveals that the WWF claim is based on a New Scientist article from 1999, which quoted a comment by Indian glaciologist Dr. Syed Hasnain. The claim has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal and Hasnain now says the comment was ‘speculative.’

So what is happening?

While the Himalayan glaciers will not disappear before my sixty-sixth birthday (you do the math), the majority are retreating, faster than elsewhere in the world. The overall mass balance is negative – ice is being lost faster than it is being gained. However, glacial behavior is not uniform across the region and there is evidence that some glaciers are advancing, particularly in the Western Himalaya and the Karakoram Ranges.

You see, the glaciers are only part of the story; they’re the sentinels of change, the canaries in the coal mine, if you will. And the changes that are being seen in the glaciers reflects the changes that are occurring to the climate systems in the region.

The key determinant of whether glaciers are retreating or advancing appears to be the summer monsoon. The monsoon, which is the engine of the weather cycle in the region and – of India’s agricultural economy – is shifting. Less precipitation (rain and snow) is falling on the Central and Eastern Himalaya (At a meeting in October 2009, Jairam Ramesh, India’s Minister of the Environment and Forests, noted that 2009 saw the worst (lowest) recorded rainfall in 37 years). As a result, many of the glaciers in that region are retreating. Glaciers in the Western Himalaya, which are fed by winter precipitation from westerlies (winds from the west) are less sensitive to changes in the monsoon and are not retreating as much, some not at all.

And what’s driving these major changes in the monsoons – climate change, of course. Yes, climate change IS affecting the Himalayas: the glaciers, the rains, the ecology, and eventually the economy and culture of one of the most heavily-populated regions of the world, the Indo-Gangetic Plain of Northern India. THAT is the fact that keeps getting lost in this discussion of the IPCC’s gaffe: climate change is having dramatic impacts on this region, home to more than a billion people.

This is an oversimplified picture of what is happening. For more detail, check out recent research by Michael Bishop, University of Nebraska at Omaha and the Global Land Ice Measurements from Space (GLIMS) Regional Center (RC) for Southwest Asia, Jeffrey Kargel (University of Arizona Department of Hydrology and Water Resources and GLIMS, and Kenneth Hewitt, Cold Regions Research Centre in Ontario, Canada.

To read the IPCC’s mea culpa, go here: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/himalaya-statement-20january2010.pdf

Next up: black carbon and the elevated heat pump, or “What Exactly is Happening to the Monsoons?”

Update and More About the Melting Himalayas

Whew!  It’s been a busy couple of months in the climate science world, and even crazier for those of us following the IPCC-Himalayan glacier debate! I’ve been so busy working on it in my professional life that I haven’t had a chance to blog about it – but that will change tomorrow!  Check in for a brand-new post which will look at what the heck is really going on in the Himalayas – are the glaciers melting or not!

I’ll give you a hint: there will still be ice there in 2035 – where and how much?  Well, those are the questions, eh? So tune in tomorrow!

A Few of My Favorite Things: Year-end Round-up of Online Ocean & Climate Science Sources

In the spirit of the season and the end of the secular year, I am working on a round-up and review of some of my favorite online sources of ocean and climate news. Most are direct sources: science journals, university websites, and government agencies, with a few others thrown in for good measure (whatever that means).

The great thing about the first two is that both allow you to get the details of the latest published research without being subscribed to the journals themselves. That’s no mean feat: a one-year subscription to Science or Nature will cost you at least $100 and the more specialized journals are even pricier! (Most researchers access these journals through their libraries, so they don’t pay for them either). The third is a freebie form one of those journals (Nature) – definitely worth checking out. I’ve also included some collaborative online science info efforts, as well as the websites of the top three government agencies working on climate change: NASA, NOAA, and EPA (roughly in that order). Check them out and enjoy! Have others to suggest? Please leave your suggestions in the comments section below.  Happy Holidays!

Unlike Letterman, I’ll start with #1 first.

  1. Science Daily.  Without a doubt, my all-time favorite source of the latest science news. This site includes press releases and short articles on a dozen or so different areas of science. Those of you who follow me on Twitter may recognize them as the source of my science news tweets. My favorite subject area is “Earth & Climate.” Other cool topics include “Plants & Animals”, “Fossils & Ruins”, and “Space & Time.” I get their Science Daily Environment Headlines delivered to my email inbox daily, so I can stay current on the latest and greatest science discoveries.
  2. Futurity.org. In response to the decline in science science and research coverage by traditional news outlets, consortium of dozens research institutions have banded together to deliver the latest research news and high-quality science content directly to the public. Their website says it all: “Futurity does the work of gathering [the] news. Think of it as a snapshot of where the world is today and where it’s headed tomorrow. Discover the future.”
  3. Nature Reports Climate Change. In this free-access web resource from Nature Publishing Group, Nature Reports Climate Change reports “on climate change and its wider implications for policy, society and the economy.” It includes short articles about the latest climate change research, interviews with researchers about climate science, and short opinion pieces about the natural, social, and political implications of research findings. Each issue is approximately 24 pages and is available for Google, as a newsletter or for download as a .pdf. Excellent. Nature also has a regular climate podcast. I’m not a big podcast user, but if you are, I would check this one out.
  4. RealClimate. This is a great – if somewhat confusing – site for climate science. It also features some of the best open discussion and debate among climate scientists, allowing the public a glimpse of the way science is really done. There is a lot here but if you spend some time wading through it, you will understand a lot more of what is going on and what is really at stake in the world of climate and global change research. This site also lists dozens of other sites and blogs dedicated to science – far too many for me to discuss here, so if you’re itching for even more sources, check them out.
  5. NASA’s Climate1Stop. I have only just signed on to NASA’s new website, which is still in beta stage (be forewarned) but I am willing to go out on a limb and predict that this will become a very useful site, once the kinks are worked out. Although most people know of NASA’s space mission, this agency is also a leading source of research on climate change. In general, NASA does a good job of explaining and disseminating climate science on their main sites and Twitter, so I am confident that this site will live up to that reputation. Check it out.
  6. NOAA Paleoclimatology. Paleoclimatology is the study of past climate through the use of various proxies: tree rings, pollen, ice cores and deep-sea sediments. It forms the basis of much of what we know about how the Earth’s climate system works and helps us to predict what future change might look like. It is also a passion of mine – my area of research in grad school. Check out the links under “Paleo Perspectives” for a series of short, easily understandable explanations of some of the major findings of NOAA paleoclimate research.
  7. EPA Climate Change. This site has some basic explanations of climate science and policy. The most valuable features are the accompanying links that bring you directly to the EPA programs and text of the legislation aimed at addressing climate change. A good combination of science and policy from the folks responsible for a bit of both.
  8. Climate Science Watch. Given all the abuse and suppression of government science that went on under the Bush administration, and since having worked for a government agency, I know how easily good science can be lost in the bureaucratic shuffle, I can’t list the previous three without adding Climate Science Watch. According to their website, they are “a nonprofit public interest education and advocacy project dedicated to holding public officials accountable for the integrity and effectiveness with which they use climate science and related research in government policymaking, toward the goal of enabling society to respond effectively to the challenges posed by global warming and climate change.” Climate Science Watch is a program of the Government Accountability Project, whose website is www.whistleblower.org. That says it all, eh?
  9. The Encyclopedia of Earth. In their own words, the Encyclopedia of Earth [EOE, is] a new electronic reference about the Earth, its natural environments, and their interaction with society. The Encyclopedia is a free, fully searchable collection of articles written by scholars, professionals, educators, and experts who collaborate and review each other’s work.” EOE is a great place to find an understandable explanation of how climate models work or a definitions for those technical terms that keep showing up in articles, like “radiative forcing” or “albedo.” What I love about the EOE is that, like Wikipedia, it is a collaborative project done by people who care about their subject and really want to share knowledge with a broad audience. On the downside, like Wikipedia, some articles suffer from a lack of oversight – they are not necessarily inaccurate, but are not as clear or on-point as they could be. That said, it is still a wonderful resource.
  10. Wikipedia. I love Wikipedia. Obviously, it’s a lot more than just climate info, but there is a lot of that too. It’s not always accurate and not everything I look for is in there, but I am constantly amazed and humbled by the sheer number of topics and the people who have put their time into making a whole lot of good info (as well as useless trivia) accessible for free in multiple languages. As I mentioned above, that comes with some drawbacks, but overall it’s great.  And hey, if you find some inaccuracies, something you KNOW isn’t right, why not sign on as an editor and share your knowledge with the world? I do!

There are MANY other sources of climate and ocean science info – particularity university websites (check out Climate Matters at Columbia, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and Yale 360). What are YOUR favorites – on this or other science subjects? Please let us know in the comments section!

Enjoy this content? you should follow BraveBlueWords here!